<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Microbiology information</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.microbiologynews.info/blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.microbiologynews.info/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 13:04:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Shining Shoes Manually May Lead to Food Poisoning Risk!</title>
		<link>http://www.microbiologynews.info/blog/shining-shoes-manually-may-lead-to-food-poisoning-risk/</link>
		<comments>http://www.microbiologynews.info/blog/shining-shoes-manually-may-lead-to-food-poisoning-risk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 13:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environmental microbiology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Poisoning Bacterium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hygiene and sanitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microbiology news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pathogens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salmonella]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sanitisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automatic shoeshine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cross contamination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food poisoning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shoe polisher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shoe shine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shoe shine machine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microbiologynews.info/blog/?p=292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Who would have thought that shining shoes can cause cross contamination! or causes food poisoning! or even transfer dangerous germs to your household! Think about it &#8211; We all handle food, we touch people, we spread our germs. And what&#8217;s worst, there&#8217;s people who work in the hospitality industry that does this regularly! leading to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span id="more-292"></span>Who would have thought that shining shoes can cause cross contamination! or causes food poisoning! or even transfer dangerous germs to your household!</p>
<p>Think about it &#8211; We all handle food, we touch people, we spread our germs. And what&#8217;s worst, there&#8217;s people who work in the hospitality industry that does this regularly! leading to further risk of food poisoning!</p>
<p>When you shine or polish your shoes, you need to take them off and hold it steady in your hands before you apply the cleaning brush. Then you apply the  polish whilst at the same time making sure you&#8217;ll keep your hands away from the dirtiest part of your shoes &#8211; the soles.</p>
<p>In fact you&#8217;ll find it difficult not to touch the sole of your shoes &#8211; the area most likely to carry nasty germs! And if you want to know what type of germs you may pick up &#8211; well it&#8217;s not hard to imagine, especially when most of us work for a living and visit the toilet daily! And if you use the public toilet &#8211; it&#8217;s even more nasty&#8230; there&#8217;s salmonella, listeria, E.coli and the list goes on.</p>
<p>Well there are many solutions, but only one that stand out as being quick, easy and practical.</p>
<p>1. Don&#8217;t polish your shoes (forget about success and that important promotion) People do recognize clean and shiny shoes so that&#8217;s not an option for me.</p>
<p>2. Wear gloves &#8211; great idea, but still takes a long time</p>
<p>3. Sanitiser yours shoes before polishing &#8211; We&#8217;ll it&#8217;s a great idea, but also adds another step to a tiresome job.</p>
<p>4. Use an automatic shoe shine machine (Brillant Idea!!)</p>
<p>Well this whole thing came about when I visited the <a href="http://www.hhdexpo.com.au/exhibiting.asp?id=15&amp;t=Exhibitor+List">Hotel and Hospitality Expo in Sydney Darling Harbour</a> (13 &#8211; 16th March 2011). I came across an exhibitor that promoted automatic <a href="http://www.shoe-shine.com.au">shoe shine</a> machines and I was so impressed that I&#8217;m about to buy one of their home units ($495.00 + GST). The system (German) automatically <a href="http://www.shoe-shine.com.au/index.php?option=com_content&amp;view=article&amp;id=15&amp;Itemid=19">shines your shoes</a> in under 10 seconds, but the best thing it&#8217;s handsfree. Which means no cross contamination leading to food safety in the work environment. <a href="http://www.shoe-shine.com.au/ShoeShineBrochure.pdf"><br />
Apparently they are new to Australia and are used in hotels, clubs, retails, offices, clinics and homes in Australia. Visit http://shoe-shine.com.au for more information or download their </a>shoe shine brochure.</p>
<p>So when you visit a hotel, ask them about using their machine. They usually have one somewhere in the foyer.</p>
<div id="attachment_293" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://www.microbiologynews.info/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/DSC_2867.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-293" title="Shoe shine machine" src="http://www.microbiologynews.info/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/DSC_2867-300x199.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="199" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Automatic Shoe Shine Machine Reduces Cross Contamination</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.microbiologynews.info/blog/shining-shoes-manually-may-lead-to-food-poisoning-risk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hire a Microbiological Consultant or Not?</title>
		<link>http://www.microbiologynews.info/blog/hire-a-microbiological-consultant-or-not/</link>
		<comments>http://www.microbiologynews.info/blog/hire-a-microbiological-consultant-or-not/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 10:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Diagnostic microbiology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental microbiology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Poisoning Bacterium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General microbiology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hygiene and sanitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microbiology news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pathogens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quality Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consultants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contamination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contamination control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbiological consultants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nata]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microbiologynews.info/blog/?p=287</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You have a continual contamination problem that&#8217;s costing you money. Now the biggest question is how do you solve it? Unfortunately, most people try to fix it themselves because it&#8217;s lower cost. But is it? The scatter gun approach is one of the most commonly used tool where you fire everything at the problem hoping [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have a continual contamination problem that&#8217;s costing you money.</p>
<p>Now the biggest question is how do you solve it?</p>
<p>Unfortunately, most people try to fix it themselves because it&#8217;s lower cost. But is it? The scatter gun approach is  one of the most commonly used tool where you fire everything at the problem hoping that it will disappear. Unfortunately, it does not work that way.</p>
<p>The solution is to bring in someone with technical expertise in a similar field and most importantly a <a href="http://www.fmcgindustrysolutions.com.au/about-us.html">strong technical microbiological background</a> (not QA background). The initial costs may be high ($200 per hour), but it&#8217;s worth it in the end. By using their microbiological tracking skills &#8211; they&#8217;ll use tools to track the microorganism and along with their knowledge of the growth characteristics of the specific microorganisms &#8211; devised controls points to stop them and remove them.</p>
<p>Fix it, don&#8217;t risk it.<br />
<img src="http://us.123rf.com/400wm/400/400/lovleah/lovleah0812/lovleah081200008/3962689-forensic-scientific-or-medical-expert-places-a-swab-into-a-tube-for-further-testing-blood-analysis--.jpg" alt="Microbiologist" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.microbiologynews.info/blog/hire-a-microbiological-consultant-or-not/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stop paying too much for environmental listeria tests</title>
		<link>http://www.microbiologynews.info/blog/stop-paying-too-much-for-environmental-listeria-tests/</link>
		<comments>http://www.microbiologynews.info/blog/stop-paying-too-much-for-environmental-listeria-tests/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 03:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Diagnostic microbiology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hygiene Tests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hygiene and sanitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Listeria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pathogens]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microbiologynews.info/blog/?p=282</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Low cost listeria tests and listeria swabs]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you ever wondered why you pay so much for an environmental listeria test in a NATA accredited laboratory.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s because NATA has put so much emphasis on the quality of the laboratory that only a few labs has taken up their standards. It seems that if you can afford to get a qualified microbiologist, get the correct documentation implemented, train the staff, perform endless checks, sign off everything, pay their auditors to pick on you, have the auditor to tell you that you need $100,000K equipment and so forth. Then I think $30 &#8211; $40 for a listeria test is reasonable price to pay.</p>
<p>If only they look back to what they did in the 1980&#8242;s and realised why there were so many accredited labs  back then compared to now. You see costs is a big part and most places want NATA accreditation, however the lab staff must focus on running their business rather than spend 50% of their time on NATA. It just does not make any economical sense which is why only commercial NATA accredited laboratories survive.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a real shame as company run labs provides real technical knowledge that no commercial lab can provide. That&#8217;s why there&#8217;s so many problems in the food industry as the technical skills are gone.</p>
<p>And to the <a href="http://www.fmcgindustrysolutions.com.au/product-services/laboratory-testing-kit/listeria-swab-kit.html">cost of a listeria test</a>, it&#8217;s only $5.00. But remember, it&#8217;s only a presumptive result and still needs to be conformed, however if you are expecting negative results &#8211; then it&#8217;s a very low cost test and it&#8217;ll save you lots of money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.microbiologynews.info/blog/stop-paying-too-much-for-environmental-listeria-tests/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Protein Residue Test</title>
		<link>http://www.microbiologynews.info/blog/protein-residue-test-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.microbiologynews.info/blog/protein-residue-test-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 14:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hygiene Tests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hygiene and sanitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hygiene]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hygiene test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protein residue swab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protein residue test]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microbiologynews.info/blog/?p=277</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Protein Residue test for determining hygiene in a food manufacturing or processing plant]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an interesting test &#8211; detecting protein residue. I know that regulators love this test as it proves that the equipment surface in a food manufacturing or precessing plant is clean. However theres been a push into smaller food manufacturers and even the local butcher, deli and restaurant. The <a href="http://www.fmcgindustrysolutions.com.au/product-services/laboratory-testing-kit/pro-clean-protein-residue-test.html">Protein Residue Test</a> consist of a sterile swab in side a plastic tube.</p>
<p>You remove the swab, smear it onto the cleaned surface and then re-insert it back into the swab holder. Break off the bulb to release the special liquid and within 10 minutes you&#8217;ll know whether the surface is cleaned or not. if it&#8217;s green, it&#8217;s clean. If it&#8217;s purple it&#8217;s dirty.</p>
<p>Hey it&#8217;s a good way to check if cleaning staff are actually cleaning!<br />
<img src="http://www.fmcgindustrysolutions.com.au/product-services/laboratory-testing-kit/pro-clean-protein-residue-test.html" alt="protein residue test" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.microbiologynews.info/blog/protein-residue-test-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Protein Residue Test</title>
		<link>http://www.microbiologynews.info/blog/protein-residue-test/</link>
		<comments>http://www.microbiologynews.info/blog/protein-residue-test/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 13:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hygiene Tests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hygiene and sanitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hygiene]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protein residue test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protein test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quick]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microbiologynews.info/blog/?p=269</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Protein Residue Test is a simple but easy test to tell if you have cleaned your premises properly. Thats way the food regulators are insisting on everyone testing for it as a verification on their cleaning. All I can say is that Pro-clean is a quick and easy way to accurately monitor the cleanliness [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.fmcgindustrysolutions.com.au/product-services/laboratory-testing-kit/pro-clean-protein-residue-test/details/31/13/laboratory-testing-kit/pro-clean-protein-residue-test.html">Protein Residue Test</a> is a simple but easy test to tell if you have cleaned your premises properly. Thats way the food regulators are insisting on everyone testing for it as a verification on their cleaning.</p>
<p>All I can say is that Pro-clean is a quick and easy way to accurately monitor the cleanliness of food equipment surfaces to help ensure food safety and product quality. The cost is cheap ($3.60 each) and there&#8217;s no equipment needed. Simply swab a surface, release the reagent and if food residue is present the reagent will turn purple. The color change provides a semi-quantitative measure of the surface cleanliness.</p>
<p>The more contamination present, the quicker the color change to purple and the darker the color. PRO-Clean quickly validates the hygiene of a surface, allowing immediate corrective action to be taken if necessary.<a href="http://www.microbiologynews.info/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/proclean2.png"><img src="http://www.microbiologynews.info/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/proclean2.png" alt="" title="proclean" width="34" height="373" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-274" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.microbiologynews.info/blog/protein-residue-test/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bootwasher</title>
		<link>http://www.microbiologynews.info/blog/bootwasher/</link>
		<comments>http://www.microbiologynews.info/blog/bootwasher/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 12:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environmental microbiology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General microbiology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hygiene and sanitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microbiology news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bootwasher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contamination control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dairy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food industty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hygiene]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Listeria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[milk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salmonella]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microbiologynews.info/blog/?p=261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems that contamination is a big issue in the food industry, however stopping it from happening is not an easy task. Most experts talk about putting sanitised footbaths in place, but how many of them really know what they are talking about. Well, I finally found this great a site with a bootwasher that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems that contamination is a big issue in the food industry, however stopping it from happening is not an easy task. Most experts talk about putting sanitised footbaths in place, but how many of them really know what  they are talking about.</p>
<p>Well, I finally found this great a site with a bootwasher that works. it not only scrubs the boots, but also sanitises them as well. With harder and stronger brushes, its guarantee to work.<br />
You don&#8217;t expect anything less from German Engineering. http://www.heute.com.au</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-thumbnail wp-image-260" title="image001" src="http://www.microbiologynews.info/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/image001-150x150.gif" alt="image001" width="150" height="150" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.microbiologynews.info/blog/bootwasher/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Listeria and the Food Factory</title>
		<link>http://www.microbiologynews.info/blog/listeria-and-the-food-factory/</link>
		<comments>http://www.microbiologynews.info/blog/listeria-and-the-food-factory/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 14:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bakery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dairy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental microbiology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Poisoning Bacterium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Spoilage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General microbiology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hygiene and sanitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Listeria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microbiology news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pathogens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poultry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quality Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ready to Eat Foods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bootwasher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bootwashers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contamination]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microbiologynews.info/blog/?p=257</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Listeria is a commonly found in food manufacturing environment. The only reason it exist is that it is commonly found in drains and even the surrounding areas &#8211; and controls to reduce the levels are not functioning. Controls that are commonly found in entrances such as sanitized footbaths are not as effective as some you [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Listeria is a commonly found in food manufacturing environment.</p>
<p>The only reason it exist is that it is commonly found in drains and even the surrounding areas &#8211; and controls to reduce the levels are not functioning.</p>
<p>Controls that are commonly found in entrances such as sanitized footbaths are not as effective as some you may think.</p>
<p>What you need is an effective sanitizer and something that physically scrubs the shoe and boot such as bootwasher to not only remove organic matter, but also sanitise the boots as well. A good quality <a href="http://www.heute.com.au">boot washer</a> is more effective and recommended.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-258" title="1600-bursten-person" src="http://www.microbiologynews.info/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/1600-bursten-person.gif" alt="1600-bursten-person" width="100" height="150" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.microbiologynews.info/blog/listeria-and-the-food-factory/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lancaster Foods, LLC Voluntarily Recalls Fresh Spinach with Best Enjoyed By Dates of June 19 to June 27, 2010 Due to Possible Health Risk</title>
		<link>http://www.microbiologynews.info/blog/lancaster-foods-llc-voluntarily-recalls-fresh-spinach-with-best-enjoyed-by-dates-of-june-19-to-june-27-2010-due-to-possible-health-risk/</link>
		<comments>http://www.microbiologynews.info/blog/lancaster-foods-llc-voluntarily-recalls-fresh-spinach-with-best-enjoyed-by-dates-of-june-19-to-june-27-2010-due-to-possible-health-risk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 03:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FMCG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Listeria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spinach]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microbiologynews.info/blog/lancaster-foods-llc-voluntarily-recalls-fresh-spinach-with-best-enjoyed-by-dates-of-june-19-to-june-27-2010-due-to-possible-health-risk/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recall &#8211; June 24, 2010 – Jessup, Maryland – Lancaster Foods, LLC is voluntarily recalling fresh Spinach with the Best Enjoyed By dates of 19 JUN 10 through 27 JUN 10 sold under the brand names Krisp-Pak, Lancaster Fresh, Giant, and America&#8217;s Choice because they could be contaminated with Listeria monocytogenes. The recall extends only [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recall &#8211; June 24, 2010 – Jessup, Maryland – Lancaster Foods, LLC is voluntarily recalling fresh Spinach with the Best Enjoyed By dates of 19 JUN 10 through 27 JUN 10 sold under the brand names Krisp-Pak, Lancaster Fresh, Giant, and America&#8217;s Choice because they could be contaminated with Listeria monocytogenes. The recall extends only to products with this Use-by Date or Product Code and sold in the following states: New Jersey, Delaware, Pennsylvania, Maryland, North Carolina, and Virginia. No other Lancaster Foods, LLC products are included in the recall.</p>
<p>The recall notification is being issued out of an abundance of caution based on a random sample test conducted by the North Carolina Department of Agriculture Food &#038; Drug Protection Division (NCAGR) on fresh Spinach with the Best Enjoyed By dates of 23 JUN 10 sold under the brand name Krisp-Pak that was confirmed positive for Listeria monocytogenes in NCAGR labs. No illnesses have been associated with this possible contamination.</p>
<p>Although healthy individuals may suffer only short-term symptoms such as high fever, severe headaches, stiffness, nausea, abdominal pain and diarrhea, Listeria M. infection can cause serious and sometimes fatal infections in young children, frail, or elderly people, and others with weakened immune systems. It can also cause miscarriages and stillbirths among pregnant women. Consumers with any of these symptoms should consult their health care provider.</p>
<p>Because it is still possible that the spinach with the Best Enjoyed By dates of 19 JUN 10 through 27 JUN 10 sold under the brand names Krisp-Pak, Lancaster Fresh, Giant or America&#8217;s Coice could be on store shelves, this recall extends to retailers as well as consumers. Lancaster Foods, LLC believes that it is important to alert consumers who might still possess one of the potentially affected expired packages of spinach to immediately dispose of it.</p>
<p>Spinach included in the recall notification includes the items listed in the table below with Best Enjoyed By dates of 19 JUN 10 through 27 JUN 10.</p>
<p>Instructions for Consumers:<br />
Check your refrigerator for packaged fresh Spinach with the Best Enjoyed By dates of 19 JUN 10 through 27 JUN 10 sold under the brand name Krisp-Pak, Lancaster Fresh, Giant, or America&#8217;s Choice. The Use-by Date is found on the front of the package in the upper right hand corner.</p>
<p>Consumers who may have potentially affected product are asked to empty the contents of the package into your garbage, save the package, and contact a Lancaster Foods, LLC consumer representative toll-free at (800) 247-8125 between the hours of 8:00 am to 5:00 pm.</p>
<p>Instructions for Retailers:<br />
All Product Codes indicated expire between June 19, 2010 and June 27, 2010, inclusive, however, retailers are asked to reconfirm with their distribution centers and all individual stores to ensure that no product remains in their inventory or at store locations. A separate letter and instructions will be forwarded to all relevant Lancaster Foods, LLC customers. For additional details, retailers are asked to contact their Lancaster Foods, LLC customer service representative.</p>
<p>Complete Listing of Recalled Lancaster Foods, LLC spinach packed under the Krisp-Pac, Lancaster Fresh, Giant, and America&#8217;s Choice brands, Use-by Dates and Product Codes.</p>
<p>Bag UPC Code	Product Description	Oz<br />
33383	65201	Krisp-Pak Hydro-Cooled Fresh Spinach, Best Enjoyed by 19 JUN 10 thru 27 Jun 10	10 oz<br />
13055	01145	Lancaster Fresh, Triple Washed, All Natural, Curly Leaf Spinach, Best Enjoyed by 19 JUN 10 thru 27 JUN 10	8, 10, and 12 oz<br />
88267	09813	Giant, Fresh Spinach, Best Enjoyed by 19 JUN 10 thru 27 JUN 10	10 oz<br />
54807	76060	America&#8217;s Choice, Spinach, Cold Water Washed, Best Enjoyed by 19 Jun 10 thru 27 Jun	10 oz</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.microbiologynews.info/blog/lancaster-foods-llc-voluntarily-recalls-fresh-spinach-with-best-enjoyed-by-dates-of-june-19-to-june-27-2010-due-to-possible-health-risk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scientists Find RNA Surprises in isteria Bacteria</title>
		<link>http://www.microbiologynews.info/blog/scientists-find-rna-surprises-in-the-pathogenic-listeria-bacteria/</link>
		<comments>http://www.microbiologynews.info/blog/scientists-find-rna-surprises-in-the-pathogenic-listeria-bacteria/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 10:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dairy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Poisoning Bacterium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General microbiology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hygiene and sanitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Listeria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical microbiology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microbiology news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ready to Eat Foods]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microbiologynews.info/blog/?p=251</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The bacterium Listeria monocytogenes lives happily in soil and in your compost heap, but also in water, processed meats, milk and cheese. When humans eat food contaminated with Listeria, they can develop listeriosis, an infection that triggers miscarriage in women and kills people whose immune systems are weak. Scientists would like to understand the molecular mechanisms that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The bacterium <span>Listeria monocytogenes</span> lives happily in soil and in your compost heap, but also in water, processed meats, milk and cheese. When humans eat food contaminated with <span>Listeria</span>, they can develop listeriosis, an infection that triggers miscarriage in women and kills people whose immune systems are weak. Scientists would like to understand the molecular mechanisms that transform this bacterium from a harmless soil-dweller to a dangerous human pathogen.</p>
<p>Now, a team at the Pasteur Institute in Paris has taken a major step towards realizing that goal, by mapping the genes that <span>Listeria</span> expresses under different environmental conditions. The research is reported in an advance online publication in the journal <span>Nature</span> on May 17, 2009.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-253" title="listeria" src="http://www.microbiologynews.info/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/listeria-300x193.jpg" alt="listeria" width="300" height="193" /></p>
<p class="pullquote">As head of the Pasteur Institute’s Unit of Bacteria-Cell Interactions, Howard Hughes Medical Institute international research scholar Pascale F. Cossart is proud of what she refers to as the first complete bacterial operon map. Pasteur scientists François Jacob and Jacques Monod first described the concept of the operon in 1960. Both were awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1965 for their seminal work on operons. Operons are functional units of DNA that consist of several adjacent genes controlled by a common promoter—a piece of DNA that determines where and when a gene is active. The genes in operons are transcribed into a single piece of messenger RNA (mRNA).</p>
<p>Since Jacob and Monod first coined the term operon, scientists’ understanding of gene regulation has evolved considerably. Researchers now know, for example, that what was once called “junk” RNA because it wasn’t translated into protein, can nevertheless fulfil important functions. Cossart’s group had previously identified a piece of such non-coding RNA that regulate <span>Listeria</span>’s ability to infect cells, which suggested to them that RNA regulation might be widely exploited by <span>Listeria</span> to aid survival. Cossart and her colleagues decided to map <span>Listeria</span>’s transcriptional program in a systematic way in order to identify as many of those RNA switches as possible.</p>
<p>The biotechnology company Affymetrix built Cossart customized tiling microarrays—that is, arrays of DNA probes that correspond to overlapping stretches of the <span>Listeria</span>genome. Armed with these arrays, a small army of researchers from Cossart’s and other labs, led by postdoctoral fellow Alejandro Toledo-Arana, compared bacteria grown in the lab with bacteria extracted from the intestine of <span>Listeria</span>-inoculated mice or<span> </span>with bacteria from inoculated samples of human blood. They also compared normal or wild-type bacteria with mutants that had been genetically altered so that they lacked certain known virulence factors.</p>
<p>Their analysis turned up many surprises, one of the biggest of which was how the bacterium’s transcriptome shifts between its soil-dwelling and intestinal modes. “When it arrives in the intestine it turns up the activity of many genes and turns down others, so we see a dramatic reshaping of the transcriptional programme. Strikingly, a series of non-coding RNAs are expressed more often in the intestine or in the blood,” Cossart says. The researchers identified one particular protein, SigB, that controls a series of genes that are needed for <span>Listeria</span> to adapt to the human gut, whereas a different protein, PrfA, switches on genes needed for survival and replication in the blood. By comparing mutant and wild-type bacteria, they identified two non-coding RNAs that appear to contribute to the virulence of <span>L. monocytogenes</span>.</p>
<p>And there were more surprises to come. The researchers found very long untranslated regions (UTRs) of RNA—that is, part of an RNA that is not translated into protein—that overlapped with several genes on the opposite strand and regulated their expression. This was the case, for example, for three genes that are involved in the manufacture of the<span>Listeria</span> flagella, the tiny protrusions that allow it to move and find its way in different environments. A known repressor of flagellum synthesis, MogR, turns out to have one very long UTR that spans all three flagellum genes and acts as an antisense RNA, which can block mRNA from being transcribed into a protein</p>
<p>Cossart’s team also identified about 40 riboswitches, RNA structures at the front of genes that act as sensors, stopping translation or expression of the RNA when enough of the gene’s protein product has been made. Some of these riboswitches controlled expression of the gene downstream of them—as had previously been reported—but also the gene upstream. In other words, a riboswitch can extend its influence in both directions, a finding contrary to what anyone had suspected.</p>
<p>These and other regulatory mechanisms will almost certainly turn up in other microorganisms, Cossart says. She believes her group’s paper is likely to be the first of many that will describe, in increasingly minute detail, the complex transcriptional checks and balances that in the case of <span>Listeria </span>make<span> </span>it<span> </span>such a versatile organism.</p>
<p>In the next 10 years, she predicts, the study of bacteria in all their habitats—not just the pathogenic ones—will become a hot topic in research. And the concept of junk in molecular biology will finally be buried, as people realize that when it comes to the genome, nothing is wasted.</p>
<p>Source: http://www.hhmi.org/news/cossart20090517.html</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.microbiologynews.info/blog/scientists-find-rna-surprises-in-the-pathogenic-listeria-bacteria/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Barack Obama Creates Food Safety Working Group After Eating Bad Peanuts</title>
		<link>http://www.microbiologynews.info/blog/barack-obama-creates-food-safety-working-group-after-eating-bad-peanuts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.microbiologynews.info/blog/barack-obama-creates-food-safety-working-group-after-eating-bad-peanuts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 12:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Food Poisoning Bacterium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Spoilage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food recalls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General microbiology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hygiene and sanitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microbiology news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pathogens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quality Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ready to Eat Foods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salmonella]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microbiologynews.info/blog/?p=247</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now if you think that Salmonella in Peanuts is making news these days - well you&#8217;re right. It seems that Barack Obama &#8211; the 44th US president may have had his own expereince that he decided to create a new Food Safety Working Group. And the best thing about it &#8211; it was officially announced at his [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="TEXT-ALIGN: left">Now if you think that Salmonella in Peanuts is making news these days - well you&#8217;re right. It seems that Barack Obama &#8211; the 44th US president may have had his own expereince that he decided to create a new Food Safety Working Group. And the best thing about it &#8211; it was officially announced at his weekly address.</p>
<p style="TEXT-ALIGN: left">That&#8217;s right &#8211;  up there with the big agenda. The economy, the war in Iraq, Recession and now the deadly peanut.</p>
<p style="TEXT-ALIGN: left">Have a read and tell me what you think.</p>
<p style="TEXT-ALIGN: left"> </p>
<p style="TEXT-ALIGN: center"><strong>THE WHITE HOUSE</strong></p>
<p>Office of the Press Secretary<br />
_______________________________________________________________________________<br />
EMBARGOED UNTIL 6:00 AM ET                              SATURDAY, March 14, 2009</p>
<p><strong>WEEKLY ADDRESS: President Barack Obama Announces Key FDA Appointments and Tougher Food Safety Measures</strong><br />
 </p>
<p style="TEXT-ALIGN: left">WASHINGTON – In his weekly address, President Barack Obama announced the appointments of Dr. Margaret Hamburg as Commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration, and Dr. Joshua Sharfstein as the Principal Deputy Commissioner, as well as the creation of a new Food Safety Working Group.  This Food Safety Working Group will be chaired by the Secretaries of Health and Human Services and the Department of Agriculture and it will coordinate with other agencies and senior officials to advise the President on improving coordination throughout the government, examining and upgrading food safety laws, and enforcing laws that will keep the American people safe.</p>
<p>In addition, the President also announced two other measures to protect the American people.  The Department of Agriculture will close a loophole to prevent diseased cows from entering the food supply.  And, the government will invest in the FDA to substantially increase the number of food inspectors and modernize food safety labs.<br />
 </p>
<p style="TEXT-ALIGN: left"><strong>President Obama announced his appointments of the following individuals today:</strong></p>
<p><strong>Margaret &#8220;Peggy&#8221; Hamburg<br />
</strong>Dr. Hamburg is a nationally and internationally recognized leader in public health and medicine, and an authority on global health, public health systems, infectious disease, bioterrorism and emergency preparedness. She served as the Nuclear Threat Initiative&#8217;s founding Vice President for the Biological Program. Before joining NTI, she was the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Prior to this, she served for six years as the Commissioner of Health for the City of New York and as the Assistant Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health.</p>
<p><strong>Joshua &#8220;Josh&#8221; Sharfstein<br />
</strong>Dr. Joshua M. Sharfstein is Commissioner of Health for the City of Baltimore.  He also serves as chair of the board of four affiliated nonprofit agencies.  He has been recognized as a national leader for his efforts to protect children from unsafe jewelry and over-the-counter medication, and ensuring Americans with disabilities have access to prescription drugs. He is a member of the Board on Population Health and Public Health Practice of the Institute of Medicine.</p>
<p>The full audio of the address is <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/WeeklyAddress/Audio/2009/03/20090313-LQPXWZ/20090313_Weekly_Address.mp3">HERE</a>. The video can be viewed online at <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/">www.whitehouse.gov</a>.</p>
<p style="TEXT-ALIGN: center"> <strong></p>
<p>Remarks of President Barack Obama<br />
Weekly Address<br />
Saturday, March 14, 2009<br />
Washington, DC</strong></p>
<p>I’ve often said that I don’t believe government has the answer to every problem or that it can do all things for all people. We are a nation built on the strength of individual initiative. But there are certain things that we can’t do on our own. There are certain things only a government can do. And one of those things is ensuring that the foods we eat, and the medicines we take, are safe and don’t cause us harm. That is the mission of our Food and Drug Administration and it is a mission shared by our Department of Agriculture, and a variety of other agencies and offices at just about every level of government.</p>
<p>The men and women who inspect our foods and test the safety of our medicines are chemists and physicians, veterinarians and pharmacists. It is because of the work they do each and every day that the United States is one of the safest places in the world to buy groceries at a supermarket or pills at a drugstore. Unlike citizens of so many other countries, Americans can trust that there is a strong system in place to ensure that the medications we give our children will help them get better, not make them sick; and that a family dinner won’t end in a trip to the doctor’s office.</p>
<p>But in recent years, we’ve seen a number of problems with the food making its way to our kitchen tables. In 2006, it was contaminated spinach. In 2008, it was salmonella in peppers and possibly tomatoes. And just this year, bad peanut products led to hundreds of illnesses and cost nine people their lives – a painful reminder of how tragic the consequences can be when food producers act irresponsibly and government is unable to do its job. Worse, these incidents reflect a troubling trend that’s seen the average number of outbreaks from contaminated produce and other foods grow to nearly 350 a year – up from 100 a year in the early 1990s.</p>
<p>Part of the reason is that many of the laws and regulations governing food safety in America have not been updated since they were written in the time of Teddy Roosevelt. It’s also because our system of inspection and enforcement is spread out so widely among so many people that it’s difficult for different parts of our government to share information, work together, and solve problems. And it’s also because the FDA has been underfunded and understaffed in recent years, leaving the agency with the resources to inspect just 7,000 of our 150,000 food processing plants and warehouses each year. That means roughly 95% of them go uninspected.</p>
<p>That is a hazard to public health. It is unacceptable. And it will change under the leadership of Dr. Margaret Hamburg, whom I am appointing today as Commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration. From her research on infectious disease at the National Institutes of Health to her work on public health at the Department of Health and Human Services to her leadership on biodefense at the Nuclear Threat Initiative, Dr. Hamburg brings to this vital position not only a reputation of integrity but a record of achievement in making Americans safer and more secure. Dr. Hamburg was one of the youngest people ever elected to the National Academy of Sciences’ Institute of Medicine. And her two children have a unique distinction of their own. Their birth certificates feature her name twice – once as their mother, and once as New York City Health Commissioner. In that role, Dr. Hamburg brought a new life to a demoralized agency, leading an internationally-recognized initiative that cut the tuberculosis rate by nearly half, and overseeing food safety in our nation’s largest city. </p>
<p>Joining her as Principal Deputy Commissioner will be Dr. Joshua Sharfstein. As Baltimore’s Health Commissioner, Dr. Sharfstein has been recognized as a national leader for his efforts to protect children from unsafe over-the-counter cough and cold medications. And he’s designed an award-winning program to ensure that Americans with disabilities had access to prescription drugs.</p>
<p>Their critical work – and the critical work of the FDA they lead – will be part of a larger effort taken up by a new Food Safety Working Group I am creating. This Working Group will bring together cabinet secretaries and senior officials to advise me on how we can upgrade our food safety laws for the 21st century; foster coordination throughout government; and ensure that we are not just designing laws that will keep the American people safe, but enforcing them. And I expect this group to report back to me with recommendations as soon as possible.</p>
<p>As part of our commitment to public health, our Agriculture Department is closing a loophole in the system to ensure that diseased cows don’t find their way into the food supply. And we are also strengthening our food safety system and modernizing our labs with a billion dollar investment, a portion of which will go toward significantly increasing the number of food inspectors, helping ensure that the FDA has the staff and support they need to protect the food we eat.</p>
<p>In the end, food safety is something I take seriously, not just as your President, but as a parent. When I heard peanut products were being contaminated earlier this year, I immediately thought of my 7-year old daughter, Sasha, who has peanut butter sandwiches for lunch probably three times a week. No parent should have to worry that their child is going to get sick from their lunch. Just as no family should have to worry that the medicines they buy will cause them harm. Protecting the safety of our food and drugs is one of the most fundamental responsibilities government has, and, with the outstanding team I am announcing today, it is a responsibility that I intend to uphold in the months and years to come.</p>
<p>Thank you.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-248" title="obama_jedi_knight" src="http://www.microbiologynews.info/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/obama_jedi_knight-291x300.jpg" alt="obama_jedi_knight" width="291" height="300" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.microbiologynews.info/blog/barack-obama-creates-food-safety-working-group-after-eating-bad-peanuts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://www.whitehouse.gov/WeeklyAddress/Audio/2009/03/20090313-LQPXWZ/20090313_Weekly_Address.mp3" length="5327632" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

